Company
LinkedIn
Title
AI-Driven Security Posture Management Platform
Industry
Tech
Year
2024
Summary (short)
LinkedIn developed the Security Posture Platform (SPP) to enhance their security infrastructure management, incorporating an AI-powered interface called SPP AI. The platform streamlines security data analysis and vulnerability management across their distributed systems. By leveraging large language models and a comprehensive knowledge graph, the system improved vulnerability response speed by 150% and increased digital infrastructure coverage by 155%. The solution combines natural language querying capabilities with sophisticated data integration and automated decision-making to provide real-time security insights.
LinkedIn's implementation of their Security Posture Platform (SPP) with an AI-driven interface represents a significant case study in deploying LLMs in a production environment, particularly for security applications. This case study demonstrates both the potential and challenges of implementing LLM-powered systems in enterprise security contexts. The core challenge LinkedIn faced was managing security vulnerabilities and insights across their vast infrastructure that serves over a billion members. Traditional methods of identifying and patching vulnerabilities weren't scaling effectively with their growing digital footprint. Their solution was to develop SPP, which combines a security knowledge graph with AI capabilities to provide a comprehensive view of their security landscape. The heart of the LLMOps implementation is SPP AI, which serves as an intelligent interface to their security knowledge graph. The system architecture reveals several important aspects of production LLM deployment: Context Generation and Management: The team developed a sophisticated approach to context generation that involves multiple stages. They start with seed data - carefully curated predefined queries and responses that serve as the foundation for the system. This is augmented through synthetic data generation using LLMs to expand the coverage of potential scenarios. The system also incorporates real-time metadata from user interactions to enrich the context. All this information is then embedded into a vector index for efficient retrieval. Query Processing Architecture: The system implements a multi-stage query processing pipeline. Instead of directly mapping natural language to API endpoints, they developed a function-based query mapping system that leverages the LLM's function calling capabilities to identify relevant nodes in their knowledge graph. This demonstrates a practical solution to the challenge of using LLMs with GraphQL APIs, where the variety of possible queries makes traditional function mapping difficult. Testing and Accuracy: The team implemented a comprehensive testing framework to ensure reliability in production. They started with early experiments using GPT-3 (Davinci) which achieved 40-50% accuracy in blind tests. Through iterations and model upgrades to GPT-4, they improved this to 85-90% accuracy. Their testing approach includes: * Carefully curated seed data for training * Validation datasets for edge cases * Human expert validation of outputs * Continuous iteration and refinement based on feedback Production Challenges and Solutions: The case study highlights several key challenges in deploying LLMs in production: * Data Volume: Their graph contained hundreds of gigabytes of data, which exceeded early model capabilities. They had to develop innovative approaches to work within these constraints. * Model Evolution: During development, new models and capabilities emerged, requiring system adaptations and rework. * Hallucination Management: They found that careful tuning of context and prompts was crucial for reducing hallucinations, particularly in predicting node/relationship labels and properties. Infrastructure Integration: The system integrates with over two dozen security data sources through their knowledge graph. The AI layer provides insights across all these sources without requiring individual integration points. They used Azure OpenAI's private models for secure testing and rapid iteration. Results and Impact: The implementation showed significant improvements in their security operations: * 150% improvement in vulnerability response speed * 155% increase in digital infrastructure coverage * Enhanced ability to handle complex security queries in natural language * Improved accessibility of security insights for team members Future Development: The team is exploring several areas for improvement: * Investigation of smaller, specialized language models for specific tasks * Development of proactive mitigation capabilities * Enhanced integration with decision systems for automated threat prevention Technical Architecture Details: The system employs a sophisticated multi-component architecture: * Vector indexing for efficient context retrieval * Multiple query generation methods including both GraphQL and Cypher * Flexible query routing to different backend systems * Output summarization with conversation memory * Comprehensive accuracy testing framework The case study demonstrates important principles for LLMOps in production: * The importance of starting with well-structured data (their normalized graph) * The value of safe experimentation environments for rapid iteration * The need for robust testing and validation frameworks * The importance of designing systems that can adapt to evolving model capabilities * The critical role of proper context management and prompt engineering in reducing hallucinations This implementation shows how LLMs can be effectively deployed in production for security applications, while highlighting the importance of careful architecture design, comprehensive testing, and continuous improvement processes.

Start your new ML Project today with ZenML Pro

Join 1,000s of members already deploying models with ZenML.