Vimeo developed a prototype AI help desk chat system that leverages RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) to provide accurate customer support responses using their existing Zendesk help center content. The system uses vector embeddings to store and retrieve relevant help articles, integrates with various LLM providers through Langchain, and includes comprehensive testing of different models (Google Vertex AI Chat Bison, GPT-3.5, GPT-4) for performance and cost optimization. The prototype demonstrates successful integration of modern LLMOps practices including prompt engineering, model evaluation, and production-ready architecture considerations.
# Vimeo's AI Help Desk Implementation Case Study
## Project Overview
Vimeo developed a sophisticated AI-powered help desk system to enhance their customer support capabilities. The project serves as both a practical solution and a testbed for evaluating AI capabilities in production. The system was designed to provide immediate, accurate responses to customer queries by leveraging existing help center content through modern LLMOps practices.
## Technical Architecture
### Vector Store Implementation
- Used vector embeddings to store and retrieve Zendesk help articles
- Implemented document chunking strategy using HTML tags as delimiters
- Stored metadata (URLs, titles, tags) alongside embeddings for enhanced retrieval
- Used HNSWLib as the vector store for the initial prototype
- Implemented webhook system from Zendesk for real-time content updates
### LLM Integration
- Utilized Langchain's ConversationalRetrievalQAChain for orchestrating the chat flow
- Implemented context-aware question reformulation using chat history
- Integrated multiple LLM providers:
### Production Architecture Considerations
- Implemented authentication using Google Cloud Platform's Workload Identity for Kubernetes deployments
- Designed for model switching capability to handle different query types
- Built system redundancy through multiple AI provider support
- Created flexible vector store architecture supporting multiple documentation sources
## Model Evaluation and Comparison
### Performance Analysis
- Google Vertex AI Chat Bison:
- OpenAI Models:
- Azure OpenAI:
### Cost Analysis
- Vertex AI: $0.0005 per 1,000 characters (input/output)
- GPT-3.5 Turbo: 0.0015/1,000 tokens (input), 0.002/1,000 tokens (output)
- Consideration of token-to-character ratio in actual cost calculations
## Quality Assurance and Safety
### Quality Control Measures
- Temperature parameter optimization (set to 0) for consistent responses
- Implementation of detailed instruction prompts
- Source URL verification and tracking
- Handling of training data discrepancies
### Safety Implementation
- Vertex AI safety filters for harmful content detection
- Prompt restrictions for Vimeo-specific content
- Response moderation for inappropriate queries
- Integration with provider-specific safety features
## Technical Challenges and Solutions
### Data Management
- Training data overlap detection and handling
- Implementation of metadata tagging for source verification
- URL management and validation system
### Response Quality
- Temperature parameter optimization
- Prompt engineering for consistent outputs
- Implementation of response validation mechanisms
### System Integration
- Webhook implementation for real-time content updates
- Authentication handling across different providers
- Error handling and fallback mechanisms
## Production Considerations
### Scalability
- Vector store design for growing content
- Multiple AI provider support
- Kubernetes deployment ready
### Monitoring and Maintenance
- Content update tracking
- Response quality monitoring
- Cost tracking across providers
- Performance metrics collection
### Security
- Authentication implementation
- Data privacy considerations
- Provider-specific security features utilization
## Future Developments
### Planned Improvements
- Enhanced response validation mechanisms
- Expanded content source integration
- Advanced monitoring systems
- User feedback integration
### Architectural Evolution
- Potential multi-model approach
- Enhanced context handling
- Improved response generation strategies
The implementation demonstrates a comprehensive approach to LLMOps, incorporating best practices in model deployment, evaluation, and maintenance while addressing real-world challenges in a production environment. The system's flexible architecture and thorough evaluation process provide valuable insights for similar implementations in enterprise environments.
Start your new ML Project today with ZenML Pro
Join 1,000s of members already deploying models with ZenML.