Company
Honeycomb
Title
The Hidden Complexities of Building Production LLM Features: Lessons from Honeycomb's Query Assistant
Industry
Tech
Year
2024
Summary (short)
Honeycomb shares candid insights from building Query Assistant, their natural language to query interface, revealing the complex reality behind LLM-powered product development. Key challenges included managing context window limitations with large schemas, dealing with LLM latency (2-15+ seconds per query), navigating prompt engineering without established best practices, balancing correctness with usefulness, addressing prompt injection vulnerabilities, and handling legal/compliance requirements. The article emphasizes that successful LLM implementation requires treating models as feature engines rather than standalone products, and argues that early access programs often fail to reveal real-world implementation challenges.
## Core Challenges ### Context Window Management - Customer schemas exceeding 5000 unique fields - Solutions considered: ### Performance Issues - LLM response times: 2-15+ seconds - GPT-4 too slow for production use - Chaining limitations - Compound probability challenges - Latency constraints ### Prompt Engineering Complexities - Limited established practices - Technique effectiveness: - Balance between specificity and flexibility ## Implementation Decisions ### Security Measures - Non-destructive outputs - No database connections - Output validation - Interface limitations - Rate limiting - Truncated inputs/outputs - No chat UI ### Legal & Compliance - Provider security audits - Updated terms and conditions - UI-accessible terms - Opt-out controls - BAA considerations - Data privacy management ### Product Design Choices - Focused on UI extension - Avoided standalone chat interface - Emphasis on user experience - Integration with existing tools - Practical utility focus ## Key Learnings ### Technical Insights - LLMs as feature engines, not products - Importance of non-destructive design - Prompt injection vulnerability management - Performance optimization strategies - Context window workarounds ### Business Considerations - Legal compliance requirements - Customer privacy needs - Enterprise agreement impacts - Early access limitations - Marketing vs reality gap ### Development Approach - Aggressive scoping - Design validation importance - Iterative improvement - User feedback integration - Security-first mindset ## Best Practices Emerged ### Implementation Strategy - Start with limited scope - Focus on core functionality - Build robust validation - Maintain security controls - Consider compliance early ### Technical Architecture - Limit LLM dependencies - Implement strong validation - Focus on performance - Build safety mechanisms - Plan for scale ### Product Integration - Seamless UI integration - Clear user controls - Transparent limitations - Easy opt-out options - Clear documentation

Start your new ML Project today with ZenML Pro

Join 1,000s of members already deploying models with ZenML.